File #: 2023-3330    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Non-Consent Status: Passed
File created: 11/17/2023 In control: ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
On agenda: 12/13/2023 Final action: 12/13/2023
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Sponsors: Lorenzo Tyner
Attachments: 1. Agenda Report, 2. CS-2023-1418BD Final Agmt & SOW_Insight
Related files: 2023-3369

FROM:                     Robert Thompson, General Manager

                     Originator: Lorenzo Tyner, Assistant General Manager

 

SUBJECT:

 

title

PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES

end

 

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

 

recommendation

RECOMMENDATION:  Recommend to the Board of Directors to:

Approve a Professional Consultant Services Agreement contract to Insight North America LLC to provide Investment Management Services, Specification No. CS-2023-1418BD, for five years, with two (2) optional two-year renewals.

body

 

BACKGROUND

 

The Orange County Sanitation District (OC San) has utilized Chandler Asset Management, Inc. to manage OC San’s portfolio since November 2014.  Services include making investment decisions, completing investment transactions, and reporting investment results in accordance with the California Government Code and OC San’s Investment Policy.

 

RELEVANT STANDARDS

 

                     Ensure the public’s money is wisely spent

 

PROBLEM

 

As OC San has used the same investment manager for several years and the Administration Committee deemed it prudent to re-evaluate the availability of these services in today’s open market, from both a cost and performance basis, and to conduct a competitive proposal process for these services.

 

PROPOSED SOLUTION

 

Approve a Professional Consultant Services Agreement with Insight North America LLC.

 

TIMING CONCERNS

 

Proposals are valid for 180 calendar days from the proposal due date of August 30, 2023.

 

RAMIFICATIONS OF NOT TAKING ACTION

 

OC San will continue with the current Investment Manager.

 

PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

 

October 2014 - The Board of Directors selected Chandler Asset Management as OC San’s Investment Portfolio Manager and authorized staff to negotiate a professional services agreement.

 

September 2014 - The Administration Committee continued the selection of OC San’s Investment Manager.

 

February 2014 - The Administration Committee approved a Request for Proposal for Investment Management.

 

June 1995 - The Board of Directors selected PIMCO as OC San’s external investment portfolio manager.

 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

A Request for Proposal was issued on July 27, 2023, via PlanetBids.  Proposals were due on August 30, 2023.  OC San received 17 proposals that are valid for 180 calendar days from the proposal due date.

 

Prior to receipt of proposals, an Evaluation Team was formed consisting of the Assistant General Manager, Director of Finance, and a Senior Accountant.  The Team was chaired by a Purchasing representative as a non-voting member.  On September 5, 2023, the Evaluation Team met to discuss the policies and procedures for the evaluation process.

 

Individual scoring was the chosen method of evaluation for this procurement.  Members of the Team performed an independent review of the proposals and later met as a group with the Buyer to discuss their preliminary scores and discuss any questions/concerns they had.  Proposals were evaluated based on the following criteria:

 

CRITERION

WEIGHT

ADV Part II Submittal

Pass/Fail

1. Qualifications of the Firm

30%

            a. Qualitative (20%)

 

            b. Quantitative (10%)

 

2. Staffing & Project Organization

20%

3. Work Plan

30%

4. Cost

20%

 

The quantitative review of each proposal was an evaluation of past investment portfolio performance, analyzed by a third-party consultant.

 

The Evaluation Team first reviewed and scored the proposals based upon the criteria listed above, other than cost and quantitative performance analysis.

 

Rank

Proposer

ADV Part II

Criterion 1 (Max 20%)

Criterion 2 (Max 20%)

Criterion 3 (Max 30%)

Subtotal (Max 70%)

1

Chandler Asset Management, Inc.

Pass

16.0%

16.0%

25.0%

57.0%

2

PFM Asset Management LLC

Pass

15.7%

15.3%

24.0%

55.0%

3

Pacific Investment Management Company LLC

Pass

15.7%

15.7%

23.5%

54.9%

4

Insight North America LLC

Pass

15.0%

15.3%

24.0%

54.3%

5

Meeder Public Funds

Pass

14.0%

14.7%

23.5%

52.2%

6

Public Trust Advisors, LLC

Pass

14.3%

14.3%

23.5%

52.1%

7

JPMorgan Asset Management

Pass

14.7%

14.3%

22.0%

51.0%

8

Allspring Global Investments LLC

Pass

13.3%

14.0%

23.0%

50.3%

9

RBC GAM-US

Pass

14.0%

13.3%

20.5%

47.8%

10

Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC

Pass

11.7%

13.0%

19.5%

44.2%

11

Franklin Templeton Investments

Pass

12.7%

12.0%

19.0%

43.7%

12

Garcia Hamilton & Associates, L.P.

Pass

12.3%

12.3%

18.5%

43.1%

13

Amundi Asset Management, US Inc.

Pass

12.0%

12.0%

19.0%

43.0%

14

PNC Capital Advisors, LLC

Pass

12.3%

12.0%

18.5%

42.8%

15

Segall Bryant & Hamill

Pass

11.3%

12.0%

19.5%

42.8%

16

Federated Investment Counseling

Pass

12.0%

12.0%

18.5%

42.5%

17

New Century Advisors

Pass

11.0%

12.0%

17.5%

40.5%

 

 

The firms scoring over 50% were advanced to a third-party consultant for a quantitative analysis of past performance.  The quantitative analysis compared the overall rate of return on investments for each firm since 2018.

 

Rank

Proposer

Subtotal (Max 70%)

Quantitative Analysis (Max 10%)

Subtotal (Max 80%)

1

Chandler Asset Management, Inc.

57.0%

6.5%

63.5%

2

PFM Asset Management LLC

55.0%

6.6%

61.6%

3

Insight North America LLC

54.3%

7.1%

61.4%

4

Pacific Investment Management Company LLC

54.9%

6.4%

61.3%

5

JPMorgan Asset Management

51.0%

10.0%

61.0%

6

Allspring Global Investments LLC

50.3%

9.6%

59.9%

7

Meeder Public Funds

52.2%

Non-responsive

N/A

8

Public Trust Advisors, LLC

52.1%

Withdrew

N/A

 

One firm could not provide the information needed to conduct the quantitative analysis and another firm requested to withdraw their proposal.

 

The five highest ranking firms were selected for interviews, which were conducted on November 1, 2023.  Following the interviews, the Evaluation Team adjusted their scores based on the clarifications provided during the interview process.

 

Rank

Proposer

Criterion 1 (Max 30%)

Criterion 2 (Max 20%)

Criterion 3 (Max 30%)

Total Score without cost (Max 80%)

1

Chandler Asset Management, Inc.

22.8%

16.3%

25.0%

64.1%

2

Pacific Investment Management Company LLC

22.7%

15.3%

23.5%

61.5%

3

Insight North America LLC

22.1%

15.3%

23.5%

60.9%

4

PFM Asset Management LLC

22.3%

15.0%

23.0%

60.3%

5

JPMorgan Asset Management

24.0%

14.0%

22.0%

60.0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All proposals were accompanied by a sealed cost proposal.  Cost proposals for all five remaining firms were opened.

 

Rank

Proposer

Subtotal Score without cost (Max 80%)

Cost (Max 20%)

Total Score (Max 100%)

1

Chandler Asset Management, Inc.

64.1%

17.5%

81.6%

2

Insight North America LLC

60.9%

20.0%

80.9%

3

PFM Asset Management LLC

60.3%

15.9%

76.2%

4

Pacific Investment Management Company LLC

61.5%

0.0%

61.5%

5

JPMorgan Asset Management

60.0%

0.0%

60.0%

 

The top three firms were invited to submit their Best and Final Offer (BAFO) for pricing, resulting in an adjustment to the cost scoring.

 

Rank

Proposer

Subtotal Score without cost       (Max 80%)

BAFO Cost      (Max 20%)

Total Score   (Max 100%)

1

Insight North America LLC

60.9%

20.0%

80.9%

2

Chandler Asset Management, Inc.

64.1%

16.6%

80.7%

3

PFM Asset Management LLC

60.3%

16.1%

76.4%

 

Based on these results, staff recommends awarding a Professional Consultant Services Agreement to Insight North America LLC for Investment Management Services.  The initial term of this Agreement will be five years, with two (2) optional two-year renewals.

 

CEQA

 

N/A

 

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

 

This request complies with authority levels of OC San’s Purchasing Ordinance.  This item has been budgeted in the FY 2023-24 budget.

 

ATTACHMENT

The following attachment(s) may be viewed on-line at the OC San website (www.ocsan.gov) with the complete agenda package:

 

                     Professional Consultant Services Agreement